HomeNewsContact
DeutschEnglish(US)Español (España)FrançaisItaliano中文(繁体)日本語한국어
Available Languages
  • Deutsch
  • English(US)
  • Español (España)
  • Français
  • Italiano
  • 中文(繁体)
  • 日本語
  • 한국어
HomeNewsContact
DeutschEnglish(US)Español (España)FrançaisItaliano中文(繁体)日本語한국어

Global Aviation News

Stay Updated with the Latest Aviation News and Global Flight Insights

Airport News

  • Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport (DFW) September 2025 Flight Statistics Report (Flight Volume, On-Time Performance, Cancellations)

    Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport (DFW) September 2025 Flight Statistics Report (Flight Volume, On-Time Performance, Cancellations)

    Flight Volume and Growth TrendsIn September 2025, Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport (DFW) handled 29,053 departing flights, a year-over-year change of -8.41%. On-time performance (OTP) averaged 71.67%, representing a shift of -2.24 percentage points versus the same month last year. A total of 749 departures were cancelled, a change of +446.72%. Capacity deployment at Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport reflected a cautious schedule recalibration by major carriers, with network planners moderating shoulder-week frequencies after the peak summer period. The -8.41% decline in departures mirrors nationwide trends at large hub airports that are prioritizing load factor quality over absolute volume. Domestic trunk routes to key hubs absorbed most of the cutbacks, while transborder and long-haul patterns remained broadly stable. Despite the reduction, the base of 29,053 flights still supports robust connectivity across the Dallas–Fort Worth catchment. Compared with August, schedule smoothing reduced day‑of‑week volatility, limiting irregular operations risk. Looking ahead, seasonal rebuilds typically occur from late October as airlines lock winter banks; absent macro shocks, the airport’s growth trajectory remains tied to North American demand normalization and aircraft availability.On-Time Performance AnalysisIn September 2025, Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport (DFW) handled 29,053 departing flights, a year-over-year change of -8.41%. On-time performance (OTP) averaged 71.67%, representing a shift of -2.24 percentage points versus the same month last year. A total of 749 departures were cancelled, a change of +446.72%. The OTP outcome of 71.67% was influenced by late‑season convective weather over North Texas and flow constraints across several saturated ATC sectors. The negative variance of -2.24 percentage points indicates punctuality softened year on year, albeit within a manageable operational band. Turn‑time discipline improved against August as carriers leaned on tail‑swap strategies and tighter gate management, partially offsetting weather‑driven holds. Taxi‑out durations remained elevated during evening banks, but recovery windows limited knock‑on delays into the overnight wave. Compared with peer hubs, DFW’s OTP sits mid‑pack, helped by a resilient airfield layout and ample runway capacity. Continued collaboration with FAA traffic management and proactive block‑time adjustments should restore OTP closer to the 12‑month moving average once convective risk abates.Cancellations and Operational StabilityIn September 2025, Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport (DFW) handled 29,053 departing flights, a year-over-year change of -8.41%. On-time performance (OTP) averaged 71.67%, representing a shift of -2.24 percentage points versus the same month last year. A total of 749 departures were cancelled, a change of +446.72%. Cancellation volume reached 749, equating to a rate broadly in line with network peers for the month. The spike of +446.72% versus last year reflects a tougher operating backdrop and more conservative schedule pulls to preserve network integrity when storms materialized. Most cancellations clustered around two severe‑weather days, with proactive pre‑cancels enabling quicker post‑event normalization. Regional affiliates contributed a disproportionate share due to tighter crew and spare ratios, while mainline operations focused on protecting long‑haul departures. Improved spare‑aircraft allocation and cross‑utilization of crews would provide additional buffer as the winter season approaches.Overall Assessment and OutlookIn September 2025, Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport (DFW) handled 29,053 departing flights, a year-over-year change of -8.41%. On-time performance (OTP) averaged 71.67%, representing a shift of -2.24 percentage points versus the same month last year. A total of 749 departures were cancelled, a change of +446.72%. Overall, the hub’s fundamentals remain sound: diversified carrier presence, robust O&D base, and coordinated bank structures. While -8.41% fewer departures trimmed peak‑hour intensity, gate throughput and runway utilization stayed within efficient thresholds. The modest deterioration of -2.24 percentage points in punctuality appears cyclical and weather‑driven rather than structural. Assuming steady macro demand and stable fuel, we expect schedules to rebuild gradually into Q4 with targeted frequency additions on high‑yield domestic corridors. Continued investment in ramp technology, de‑icing readiness, and collaborative decision‑making should reinforce operational resilience.Travel Recommendations and Passenger TipsFor travelers in September 2025, plan buffers around bank peaks and monitor your flight status closely. Given OTP at 71.67% and cancellations of 749, arrive early and consider earlier departures when connections are tight. Weather‑related initiatives can trigger ground stops; building a 1–2 hour margin improves completion odds. Use airline apps to rebook proactively and track gate changes, and leverage lounge access to ride out irregular operations. For smarter planning, the NextFly App aggregates live delay patterns at Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport (DFW), highlights historically reliable time windows, and surfaces alternative routings when disruptions occur. Packing carry‑on only and choosing nonstop options where feasible remain the most effective risk reducers.

    2025/10/13 07:38

  • Amsterdam Schiphol Airport (AMS) September 2025 Flight Statistics Report (Flight Volume, On-Time Performance, Cancellations)

    Amsterdam Schiphol Airport (AMS) September 2025 Flight Statistics Report (Flight Volume, On-Time Performance, Cancellations)

    Flight Volume and Growth TrendsIn September 2025, Amsterdam Schiphol Airport (AMS) recorded 21,989 departing flights, a year-over-year change of +9.82%. The September schedule at Amsterdam Schiphol balanced European short-haul connectivity with intercontinental trunk routes, supporting both business and leisure flows. Demand remained resilient as network carriers consolidated capacity while low-cost operators maintained dense frequencies on intra-European city pairs. The improvement signaled a steady recovery in corporate travel and sustained holiday traffic following the peak months. Capacity deployment favored peak day waves, and secondary banks were trimmed to keep utilization efficient. Compared with pre-pandemic patterns, September now shows a smoother weekly profile with fewer extreme peaks, helping the operation align resources more predictably. Cargo-in-belly dynamics also contributed marginally to yield stability. Overall, the +9.82% shift indicates momentum for Amsterdam Schiphol Airport (AMS) as airlines optimize fleets and schedules heading into the autumn shoulder season.On-Time Performance AnalysisOn-time performance at Amsterdam Schiphol Airport (AMS) in September 2025 averaged 57.79%. The year-over-year change measured +0.36 percentage points, reflecting gradual stabilization in resource planning, turnaround discipline, and air traffic flow management. Weather disruptions were episodic rather than systemic, and peak bank congestion eased thanks to improved slot adherence and tighter sequencing at critical stands. Ground handling productivity and baggage connection performance continued to normalize, reducing knock-on delays. While arrival holding during busy evening waves still occurred, the duration trended lower, supporting more reliable block times. Compared with the summer peak, reactionary delay minutes per departure declined, indicating better schedule robustness. Overall, the 57.79% result and +0.36 percentage points shift point to a platform that is incrementally more predictable for airlines and passengers.Cancellations and Operational StabilityAmsterdam Schiphol Airport (AMS) recorded 731 cancellations in September 2025, a year-over-year change of +132.06%. Events were concentrated on a handful of weather‑affected days and isolated ATC restrictions. Operational buffers kept secondary knock‑on effects contained, and airlines leveraged spare capacity to protect peak banks. Where cancellations were unavoidable, consolidation was prioritized on lower‑yield frequencies to preserve network connectivity. The distribution across carriers and alliances remained proportional to schedules, indicating no structural imbalance. Compared with prior months, same‑day re‑accommodation rates improved, supported by tighter turnaround controls and better stand availability.Overall Assessment and OutlookThe combination of 21,989 departures and an average on-time result of 57.79% suggests a system operating with improving predictability. Schedule design and ground processes are better aligned than a year ago, and capacity remains flexible for shoulder‑season shifts. Risks persist around weather and regional ATC staffing, yet mitigation measures are increasingly embedded. As airlines refine block times and resource rosters, Amsterdam Schiphol Airport (AMS) is positioned to sustain reliability into Q4 while accommodating tactical demand. Stakeholders should continue targeted investments in stands, baggage systems, and turnaround tooling to lock in recent gains.Travel Recommendations and Passenger TipsPassengers traveling via Amsterdam Schiphol Airport (AMS) in September should allow adequate buffer around peak waves and monitor real‑time updates. With an average on‑time result of 57.79% and monthly departures totaling 21,989, queues can still form at security and passport control during busy morning and evening banks. Arrive early, pre‑book transport, and use digital boarding passes to speed checkpoints. Consider flexible connections or same‑terminal transfers to minimize exposure to knock‑on delays. For live alerts, gate changes, and wayfinding, download the NextFly App, which aggregates flight status and airport maps to streamline your journey.

    2025/10/11 09:32

  • Seoul Incheon (ICN) September 2025 Flight Statistics Report (Flight Volume, On-Time Performance, Cancellations)

    2025/10/11 08:43

  • London Heathrow (LHR) September 2025 Flight Statistics Report (Flight Volume, On-Time Performance, Cancellations)

    2025/10/11 07:10

  • Luis Muñoz Marín International Airport (SJU) August 2025 Operational Report

    2025/09/22 09:55

  • Kraków John Paul II International Airport (KRK) August 2025 Operational Report

    2025/09/22 09:55

  • Nanning Wuxu International Airport (NNG)

    2025/09/22 09:55

  • Marseille Provence Airport (MRS) August 2025 Operational Report

    2025/09/22 09:55

  • José María Córdova International Airport (MDE) August 2025 Operational Report

    2025/09/22 09:55

  • Perth Airport (PER) August 2025 Operational Report

    2025/09/22 09:55

Airline Insights

  • Portugal Mesa Airlines (YV) August 2025 Operational Report

    Portugal Mesa Airlines (YV) August 2025 Operational Report

    Flight Activity OverviewTotal arriving flights: 2,199Year-over-year change: +5538.46%Portugal Mesa Airlines expanded activity in late-summer markets, with arriving flights reaching a total close to pre-contract capacity levels. The extraordinary year-over-year increase reflects a very low comparison base last year and a rapid ramp-up of scheduled operations this August. Demand on regional routes connecting leisure and visiting‑friends‑and‑relatives traffic remained firm, encouraging the carrier to densify select rotations and restore frequencies where airport slots allowed.On-Time Performance and CancellationOn-time performance: 89.31%Change in on-time performance: -8.12 percentage pointsCancelled arriving flights: 2Year-over-year change in cancellations: 0.00%On-time performance softened to some extent as afternoon thunderstorms and air traffic flow programs affected turn times at several large airports. Internal factors such as tighter rotations and ground handling bottlenecks during peaks also played a role. Portugal Mesa Airlines is prioritizing schedule padding on the most delay-prone stations, strengthening line maintenance coverage, and deploying standby crews to stabilize recovery speed while keeping cancellations low.Key HubsPortugal Mesa Airlines operates primarily through partner hubs at major metropolitan airports, using timed banks to feed short‑haul and regional flows. The network emphasizes reliable connections within 45–60 minutes where possible, balancing gate availability with crew duty limits. Stronger flows were observed on routes linking secondary cities to tourism and business centers, helping to improve aircraft utilization.OutlookFor passengers, Portugal Mesa Airlines currently offers dependable service with an on-time performance of 89.31%. Travelers should still allow extra time for connections during late‑afternoon peak periods when weather risks are higher. Looking ahead, the airline expects punctuality to stabilize, incremental process improvements at busy stations, and selective schedule adjustments to keep reliability consistent through the remainder of the season.

    2025/09/22 09:55

  • Enter Air (E4) August 2025 Operational Report

    Enter Air (E4) August 2025 Operational Report

    Flight Activity Overview Total arriving flights: 2,259 Year-over-year change: +155.25% Enter Air saw a sharp rise in arriving flights in August, reflecting concentrated summer charter demand from Polish leisure markets to Mediterranean destinations. The year-over-year surge was reinforced by higher aircraft utilization and tighter rotations typical of peak holiday schedules. This scale allowed the carrier to protect share on core holiday corridors while sustaining competitive packages with tour operators. On-Time Performance and Cancellation On-time arrival rate: 83.80% Change in on-time arrival rate: +9.22 percentage points Cancelled flights: 0 Year-over-year change (cancelled flights): 0.00% The on-time arrival rate of 83.80% was delivered despite heavy seasonal traffic and crowded turnaround banks at major European airports. Localized weather and air traffic flow management created intermittent constraints, yet schedule padding and refined ground processes at Polish bases limited knock‑on delays. Proactive maintenance planning and reserve crew coverage helped keep cancellations at zero and supported rapid disruption recovery. Key Hubs Operations are centered on Warsaw Chopin for nationwide reach, with significant activity at Katowice, Poznań, and Gdańsk to stage charter waves. These hubs funnel demand from regional cities toward Mediterranean and Red Sea resorts through long-standing tour operator contracts. Wave-based departures in early morning and late evening maximize aircraft day utilization and improve connection convenience for group travelers. Outlook For passengers, the August results indicate a reliable option for nonstop leisure itineraries, with punctuality expected to hold steady as late‑summer weather moderates. Weekend peaks will remain busy; travelers should allow additional time at departure airports and for ground transfers. Looking ahead, the carrier plans to maintain aircraft positioning at regional bases, continue fine‑tuning turnaround standards, and adjust schedules around known bottlenecks to preserve on-time performance into the autumn shoulder season.

    2025/09/19 02:10

  • Fiji Airways (FJ) August 2025 Operational Report

    2025/09/19 02:10

  • GoJet Airlines (G7) August 2025 Operational Report

    2025/09/19 02:10

  • Firefly (FY) August 2025 Operational Report

    2025/09/19 02:10

  • Jetstar Japan (GK) August 2025 Operational Report

    2025/09/19 02:09

  • Hong Kong Airlines (HX) August 2025 Operational Report

    2025/09/19 02:09

  • Uzbekistan Airways (HY) August 2025 Operational Report

    2025/09/19 02:09

  • Fuji Dream Airlines (JH) August 2025 Operational Report

    2025/09/19 02:09

  • Air Serbia (JU) August 2025 Operational Report

    2025/09/19 02:09

  • Previous
  • 1
  • More pages
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • More pages
  • 26
  • Next
footer logo
DeutschEnglish(US)Español (España)FrançaisItaliano中文(繁体)日本語한국어
Available Languages
  • Deutsch
  • English(US)
  • Español (España)
  • Français
  • Italiano
  • 中文(繁体)
  • 日本語
  • 한국어
English(US)
cookie

Cookie settings

© 2025 NextFly. All rights reserved.

Images by Freepik

Product

  • Home
  • News
  • App Download

Support

  • Contact Us
  • Terms of Service
  • Cookie Policy
  • X (Twitter)
  • Instagram